Mathematics

T1

Add up the first ten cubes: 1+8+27+64+125+216+343+512+729+1000 = 3025. Now compute (1+2+3+...+10)² = 55² = 3025. They're equal — and they're always equal, for any n. There's no obvious arithmetic reason that should be true. Aryabhatiya II.22 (499 CE) states the identity in a single Sanskrit verse, alongside the equally clean Σi² = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6. Alhazen and Fermat rediscover them in pieces; Faulhaber gives the systematic European treatment in 1631.

From the source

of the number of terms, the number of terms plus one, and twice the number of terms plus one is the sum of the squares. The square of the sum of the (original) series is the sum of the cubes.
The Aryabhatiya of Aryabhata, tr. W. E. Clark (1930)ch2.v22
Well-supported

Featured in

See something that doesn’t look right? File a flag with a counter-source — every flag is reviewed by editorial.

Flag this claim